Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Brianna's avatar

Is this in response to the lab grown diamond trend which makes getting a bright white perfect 4c “diamond” too common? Seems like a natural pivot for EIHGs to go looking for “imperfections” that subtly mark their diamonds as organic and real (read: rare).

catie webster's avatar

A) The only thing that matters is what YOU like / want / etc and "The status comes from the wearer not the object" A LITTLE LOUDER FOR THE PPL IN THE BACK PLZ. I think that what we're really unpacking here via the EHIG uni ie manis / diamonds / et al is that the truest status indicator is CHOICE. Which now that I think about it, directly relates to CHARACTER in this context in that opting for something with character was a very specific choice bc we're all served the status quo everywhere all the time so that is easier than digging for what truly resonates. And I've been thinking about this specifically against making a STATEMENT in that a CHOICE is a personal indulgence in something that delights you and FCK everyone else and a STATEMENT is an external display for others which, to be clear, I don't think is inherently wrong. Sometimes you want to go your own way, sometimes you want to belong. Everyone has their own prerogative. But in light of the idea that accessibility leads to hegemonic collapse and status migration... Choosing things with character that delight YOU with no regard for what everyone else is doing seems the platonic ideal of trend-proof EIHG-coding, no?

And now that I've talked myself in a huge circle, B) next time you're in PB can we plz hang out?!

Brilliant (see what I did there) per usual. xx

17 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?